Aug 15
Opportunity
Build a continuity of care in the participant’s medical journey by involving the participant’s personal doctor in clinical trials. This may help to reduce the participant’s burden by avoiding duplication between standard of care / trial assessments and allowing clinical trial assessments to be completed locally.
Considerations to Help Action the Opportunity
- Clarify roles and responsibilities, in line with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (e.g., that the investigative site retains responsibility for determining if events are adverse event(s) and making treatment decisions based on personal doctor data)
- Define agreements required between investigative site, personal doctor, and sponsor (as appropriate)
- Define procedures / tools to share participant’s data between site, personal doctor, and sponsor in line with data privacy requirements
- List requirements of the personal doctor to perform trial assessments (e.g., trial specific training, delegation, safety reporting, indemnity insurance, financial indemnity, documentation such as FDA 1572, etc.)
- Partner with participants to understand their acceptance and comfort having trial assessments performed by their personal doctor
- Partner with investigative sites to ensure they can manage the requirements of working with a personal doctor and can support appropriate oversight
- Partner with personal doctor as needed for trial specific requirements (e.g., training, agreements, financial considerations, etc.)
- Understand varying levels of engagement desired by personal doctors (e.g., awareness vs. active involvement) along with engagement mapping
- Define how to empower clinical trial participants to relay appropriate information with their personal doctor including both test results with contextual ranges that could vary from standard of care
Value and Potential Benefits
- Reduces duplication of effort between trial assessments and what a participant’s personal doctor would perform as part of the standard of care
- Allows participant to have assessments performed in their usual care setting and by a personal doctor known to, and trusted, by them
- Saves the participant time and effort by reducing visits to investigative site
- Enables the personal doctor or specialized healthcare provider to treat the participant with a holistic view of their trial and non-trial needs
- Allows continuity of care delivered before, during, and after the trial
Related Blog Posts
Redesigning Clinical Trials Using Artificial Intelligence
While tech evangelists often tout artificial intelligence (AI) as healthcare’s silver bullet, the reality in clinical trials is more complex. Adoption has been cautious, shaped as much by concerns around trust and governance as by technical hurdles. Still, beneath the surface, methodical innovation is gaining momentum. AI is beginning to reshape how trials are designed,…
How Pandemic-Era Ingenuity Fuels the Future of Clinical Trials
It’s hard to believe that just five years ago, the clinical research industry found itself scrambling to adapt overnight. The COVID-19 pandemic ground global health systems to a halt and forced us all to move faster and more collaboratively than ever before. Read the full article by Allison Cuff Shimooka from The Medicine Maker here.
Science is Moving—Clinical Trials Must Catch Up
Clinical research has never been more capable of reaching new frontiers. The science is here. The technology is here. But the approach to trial design and execution hasn’t kept pace. The clinical research ecosystem proceeds cautiously for good reasons—patient safety chief among them. But too often, we’re held back by fixed mindsets and outdated processes.…