Aug 15
Opportunity
Build a continuity of care in the participant’s medical journey by involving the participant’s personal doctor in clinical trials. This may help to reduce the participant’s burden by avoiding duplication between standard of care / trial assessments and allowing clinical trial assessments to be completed locally.
Considerations to Help Action the Opportunity
- Clarify roles and responsibilities, in line with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (e.g., that the investigative site retains responsibility for determining if events are adverse event(s) and making treatment decisions based on personal doctor data)
- Define agreements required between investigative site, personal doctor, and sponsor (as appropriate)
- Define procedures / tools to share participant’s data between site, personal doctor, and sponsor in line with data privacy requirements
- List requirements of the personal doctor to perform trial assessments (e.g., trial specific training, delegation, safety reporting, indemnity insurance, financial indemnity, documentation such as FDA 1572, etc.)
- Partner with participants to understand their acceptance and comfort having trial assessments performed by their personal doctor
- Partner with investigative sites to ensure they can manage the requirements of working with a personal doctor and can support appropriate oversight
- Partner with personal doctor as needed for trial specific requirements (e.g., training, agreements, financial considerations, etc.)
- Understand varying levels of engagement desired by personal doctors (e.g., awareness vs. active involvement) along with engagement mapping
- Define how to empower clinical trial participants to relay appropriate information with their personal doctor including both test results with contextual ranges that could vary from standard of care
Value and Potential Benefits
- Reduces duplication of effort between trial assessments and what a participant’s personal doctor would perform as part of the standard of care
- Allows participant to have assessments performed in their usual care setting and by a personal doctor known to, and trusted, by them
- Saves the participant time and effort by reducing visits to investigative site
- Enables the personal doctor or specialized healthcare provider to treat the participant with a holistic view of their trial and non-trial needs
- Allows continuity of care delivered before, during, and after the trial
Related Blog Posts
Are Pragmatic Trials The Patient Recruitment Solution We’ve Been Looking For?
The age-old problem for clinical research has been the ability to recruit patients. Many clinical research professionals have tried to crack this nut, whether with technology or partnerships or both. Let’s not forget the height of DCTs during the pandemic, which served their purpose but appear to have lost luster in the last few years.…
Solving the Clinical Trial Data Problem
In a new LinkedIn article, Janice Chang, CEO of TransCelerate, and Nicholas Brooke, CEO of The Synergist & PFMD, outline how efforts like the Clinical Trial Data Network, supported by TransCelerate through technical expertise and industry-vetted solutions from our Digital Data Flow initiative, aim to make clinical trial information more structured, connected, and accessible across…
The Clinical Trial Enterprise: Can AI Fix It?
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reasonably well established in discovery and preclinical research, with success in areas such as target identification and molecular modeling. However, in clinical development, adoption has been fragmented and challenging to embed across the lifecycle. Read the full article by Rob DiCicco from Drug Discovery News here.